Talk:Weapons

From Fiesta Wiki

While it may have been easier to compare same level weapons (moving down a section only takes one scroll anyway), it was by far more cluttered, and harder to read. You must be joking if you think it was easier to read.

You navigate through the wiki with the Table of Contents anyway, so it should be as easy as possible to find what you want when looking in it. As far as useability goes, is ease in finding what you want not useability?

---

Was changing it really necessary? I mean, the section names don't say what type of weapons, its cluttered, and the color schemes are ugly... Why not just edit it when needed instead?

---

Changing it made it much more readable, and easy to compare same level weapons to each other, as well as find all of a class's weapons in one spot. The color scheme could easily have been changed.

The current layout is much harder to read, very cumbersome, wastes a lot of horizontal space and in turn, makes for an unnecessarily long page. Although easily navigated by the table of contents, once in the middle of the page, hard to get to anywhere else.

This is the best source of information on this game and I'd love for it to be more useable.

---

Hey guys. I'm in the process of adding all the equips and their names. Once I learn how to make tables, I'll add levels, damage, etc.

Just so no one else mentions it, I know shields aren't techniqly a weapon. I am putting them in both the Armor and Weapons sections because of how often they are associated with weapons, and do they are easier to access with out changing pages.

~Hyperswoss

Contents 1 Cash! 2 Lv90 Weapons! 3 Mage Weapons 4 One page for each class

Cash!

Even though I didn't finish with mage stuff, (BORRRING) I'll start with Cash Shop goods.

~Hyperswoss

I added in the tables and info for mage staff/wands up to lvl 50 for ya... yeah I was bored. For some reason the long staff pic isn't showing though. O_o
--Pritcher 14:26, 10 November 2007 (CST)

Lv90 Weapons!

Yay! Added all the info for the Lv90 weapons!

I know how big the difference between the Lv80 and Lv90 weapons is, but that's how it is in Fiesta Korea.

There is a problem though. The stats for the 60-80 weapons are WAY different in kFiesta then Gamengame Fiesta, so I don't know what to put.

~Hyperswoss

Nerfing stats. Hmmph. What a good way to inject incentive to use CS items. I am interested to see what the KFiesta weapon stats are. Could you draw a few comparisons between the versions for the one-hand swords and the axes? (Them two being the lowest-damage weapon and highest-damage weapon respectively) Icy

Mage Weapons

Not sure why, but I see an error here, it says that a disadvantage for the wands are that they have a slightly lower attack rate than staves, yet all of the staves are lower than the wands.

So unless there is an error with the Att. Rates for mage weapons, I think a new advantage for wands should be added, and a new disadvantage for staves. Ontop of such you should remove the old one. I'd do it... But I want to be clear on the whole Att. Rate first.

-Sovereignty

I suppose, what is actually meant is slower attack rate - the rate of attack is lower but the duration of each attack is higher. However, this is irrelevant. Never melee something as a mage. This is what actually matters: due to the significant advantage in mdamage of the wand when it is enhanced, my view is that one should always use a wand unless the staff they are considering has overwhelmingly attractive mods. Icy

-90er Stave

I have a 90 stave in hand and can provide the data carried. Sorry but my english is not so good. [1]

One page for each class

...This page will get really, really long if it continues to expand. How about giving each class their own page? Icy

DONE!
*Fighter Weapons, Cleric Weapons, Archer Weapons, Mage Weapons
*Fighter Cash Weapons, Cleric Cash Weapons, Archer Cash Weapons,Mage Cash Weapons

Since I am reading this, I will go ahead and throw up the new main Weapons page too. Posted in the Current Events area about this then I read this final little comment, lol.Gandalfa82 02:58, 6 August 2008 (CDT)